Posted on 11/28/2016 9:01:59 AM PST by SeekAndFind
States with recounts don’t get to vote on Dec 19th is their count is not certified. Essentially taking enough votes away from Trump and causing an election crisis. At least that is what Bill Cunningham was explaining on his radio show last night. Hillary at 232 and Trump at 260. It is quite the strategic move on the progressive’s part as Republicans stand around trying to figure out what the hell they are doing. It is way past time for us to being on the defense and we start being on the offense and shout this stuff down. It is a usurpation of power.
It’s easy, really. Let’s just use the FBI agents who combed Hillary’s 650,000 emails in seven days to do the counting, and we’ll be done by tomorrow night.
Want Democracy? No we want a Democratic Republic. A true democracy everyone would vote on everything. Wouldn’t need the House or Senate at all.
She’s done this before, although not on as large a scale. It’s a collaboration between the two frenemies. Had Jill really wanted the maximum chances of ramming her policy preferences through, Trump would not have been it and she would have bowed out of the race. This is a case of partial insanity here, of codependence.
Nope. The certified results stand. If the certified results are overturned then the electors are not appointed, then Trump wins the majority. He does not need 270, just a majority of appointed electors.
proof that she is a socialist/dem, she wants something, but wants others to pay for it.
Surely this is unnecessary and frivolous even the way she describes it. A frivolous lawsuit is punishable. Why proceed with frivolous recounts that hold up the process on behalf of a candidate who has no hope of winning with her current 1% of the vote?/p>
The honey badger is looking at this now, though. We beseech the good Lord further bless him (and us) by blowing the lid off of any skulduggery that is happening.
The house will not be involved. There is no chance that Trump fails to get a majority of appointed electors. He does not need 270. People need to read the Constitution.
Why does a candidate who received less than 1% of thr vote get to decide that she wants a recount. Unreal.
On the surface, sounds like she netted such a good haul on the first scam that she is going to run the hustle again. The low info crowd will probably keep donating long after inauguration.
Which means Trump wins. No crisis. Read the Constitution and look at the word appointed. That words means that if electors are not appointed they do not count towards the total. Trump needs the majority of the appointed delegates.
Yes there is. That's why we have filing deadlines. The EC meets on Dec 19 and that's why the recount filing deadlines are coming up now. That will give the states adequate time to get the recounts done before Dec 19.
All the alarmists out there need to take a deep breath.
Good, I wouldn't trust Paul Ryan an inch and it is conceivable that he would sell out the Republic for a sufficient bribe and open borders.
One order of chill pills please...
I got accused of complacency by telling folks to sit tight, which of course isn’t what I’m getting at.
DU is the OMG! crowd. Not us (well we may pray “oh, dear God” but on the other hand we mean it, it isn’t some vain expression).
... WI, PA, & MI as the largest chance of fraud ...
Before the election these leftwing parasites laughed about vote fraud. It doesn’t exist they said. No evidence they said. Those concerned about vote fraud are kooks they said.
Then Hillary got shellacked...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.