I worry about the potential change in results, too. I remember that Trump had a lot of attorneys that were going to be resources during the election, including being at potential polling places and his new WH counsel was previously a FEC commissioner, so it gives me some solace in thinking that Trump probably has folks working behind the scenes on these recounts - he’s just keeping mum on it.
Thanks for pointing the link out. I didn’t listen to it previously, but he mentions various things that are out in some of the media (primarily conservative), such as Soros, the bot funding, etc.
Here’s an interesting thread on the bot funding (there are mentions of same in other threads):
I Stumbled onto Something Very Strange (vanity)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3498111/posts
His comments on why is Stein challenging only states where Trump won. I was scratching my head on why she was even challenging to start with (doing it for Hillary and Soros and probably getting a nice check for it). Oathkeepers is apparently challenging votes in Colorado, Nevada, and Virginia. Like he said and someone on the thread said, they should challenge the vote in NH, too (IIRC it was only about a 3,000 vote difference).
Efforts Begin To Challenge States Clinton Won
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3498483/posts
And then there’s this:
Jill Stein Can’t ‘Guarantee’ Money Will Go to Recount, Changes $$$ Goal
Little clause at the end of the donation form: “Excess money will be spent on election “integrity” and election “reform.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3498462/posts
Glad to see there is an investigation into states Hitlery won.
Notice how quiet she is being?
Makes me wonder what she is plotting.