To: Yo-Yo
I hope you are right. But that is not how the various news outlets are portraying it. If that is what Trump means, then I agree with him. Put somebody else’s fingerprints on it.
6 posted on
11/23/2016 7:17:13 AM PST by
afraidfortherepublic
( “Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them.”)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Why do people still fall for this MSM nonsense. Trump never said he’s letting Hillary off.
12 posted on
11/23/2016 7:19:49 AM PST by
BruinX66
To: afraidfortherepublic
I know how the news outlets are reporting on it now, but
here is a live tweet from within the meeting as it happened:
Maggie Haberman
Verified account @maggieNYT
Trump says "no" when asked if he is taking investigations off the table for Clintons but adds he doesn't want to "hurt the Clintons."
Which just goes to show how the press is still manipulating the conversation by selective omission of facts.
31 posted on
11/23/2016 7:26:45 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: afraidfortherepublic
But that is not how the various news outlets are portraying it. And the various" news" organizations are all a bunch of deceivers who obfuscate everything.
To: afraidfortherepublic
But that is not how the various news outlets are portraying it.
Who really cares how the various "news" outlets are portraying it? There is nothing Trump can do about it now. He is dealing with how to get safely to Jan 21 without too much chaos. I am willing to give this time.
70 posted on
11/23/2016 8:03:03 AM PST by
Old_Grouch
(69 and AARP-free. Monthly FR contributor.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Now the various new outlets are trustworthy. Have we learned nothing yet?
97 posted on
11/23/2016 9:09:30 AM PST by
Jay Thomas
(If not for my faith in Christ, I would despair.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson