There is no information showing that anyone other than Oswald did it, whether the Warren Commission had it or not.
There is no information showing that anyone other than Oswald did it, whether the Warren Commission had it or not.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Except for the unknown fingerprint that was attributed to Mac Wallace by fingerprint experts with flawless resumes.
But that’s not why I wanted to correspond with you. I want to see how much you can think for yourself, and how much you actually know versus what you’ve been told.
Oswald, if he is indeed JFK’s assassin, is different than every other Presidential assassin and would-be assassin.
The FBI knows what the difference is, though not via any conspiracy theory stuff. It became revealed to them in their work after Hoover left, but it had nothing to do with JFK’s assassination per se.
Can you tell me what that difference is? For bonus points, tell me where the difference comes from.
Also take into account what Jack Ruby said in public and to reporter Dorthy Kilgallen, (before she supposedly committed suicide) moreover, why would George de Mohrenschildt kill himself just before testifying before the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1978?? Too many bizarre incidents regarding all parties concerned or related to the JFK asasassination, sorry. Like any other criminal investigation, one has to analyze who gains and who loses from a particular homicide.
Have you come up with anything yet?
I’ll give you a bigger hint.
It has to do with two of the three considerations that all murder investigators must take into account.
The Warren Commission addressed all three.