Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SMGFan

My take:

1. She’s not aging well.
2. Movie was good.
3. Very similar in spirit to Contact and Stanislaw lem’s Solaris.
4. NYT over hypes it, but it is a decent movie to go see. Not very many of them these days.


5 posted on 11/20/2016 6:22:18 AM PST by Fhios (In the end Hillary, MSM, and Obama were beat by Trumps pure strategic genius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fhios
She’s not aging well.

She is a good-looking 42-year-old woman.

If they had made her look young and glamorous, the movie would have made no sense.

To paraphrase Master Yoda: “When forty two years old you reach, look as good you will not.”

22 posted on 11/20/2016 8:38:47 AM PST by Haiku Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Fhios
My take: 1. She’s not aging well.

I think she looks a good 42.

31 posted on 11/20/2016 2:42:04 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson