‘Misinformation’ of course, is anything that disagrees with Mark Zuckerberg’s point of view. Because, money.
...because you’re just too stupid to know what’s real and what isn’t...
I have a family member that has this attitude. I they don’t happen upon something, it’s not true.
conveniently late
You mean he’s gonna accurately report on the number of hits on ads on fakebook??
Basically boils down to “How can we censor conservative news without it being called censorship.”
How do I know Mark Zuckerberg actually said these things? Or for that matter, that there actually is a person named Mark Zuckerberg?
I take it we won’t have to see anything from Rolling Stone in the future? How about all those news organizations that said Hillary would win?
I have a one point plan Mark Z.
Stay out of it.
The Left is the real problem anyway.
Do you realize that if the Left got it’s way, the public would own your forum and you wouldn’t get a dime for it?
Wake up!
Oh, Skippy, just go away.
Well, Mark, you’ll be happy to know that I do not use facebook and never will.
You have no power over me.
Zuckerberg's set himself up. Somebody's got to send him into retirement.
Zuckerberg's set himself up. Somebody's got to send him into retirement.
I refuse to use the communist censoring facebook. Their rules don’t matter to me. It must matter to snowflakes.
Eliminate:
1. NBC News
2. ABC News
3. CBS News
4. CNN
5. MSNBC
6. The New York Times
7. The Washington Post
Because he knows more than you do.
/s
Zuckernews!
The final few weeks, I saw a lot of questionable stuff flying around FB, from BOTH SIDES.
So in the final analysis, what is good for the goose is also good for the gander.
Censor away, if you can. It appears Trump’s campaign did well. Probably due in part, to Bannon’s involvement and resources he brought to the effort.
I am a lay person on social media, but the subject fascinates me.
fake news from the Clinton News Network and New York Slime?
IMAGE OWERSHIP:
At one early point in internet history, Zuckerberg was going to make his user permissions such that if you uploaded to your FB account a photo of you or ANYONE featuring a product, Mark would OWN the image AND he would have the right to license it for advertising.
Like you snap a photo of your hot sister with a bottle of Stolichnaya Vodka...?
Mark would charge Stoli for using that photo, and Stoli would PAY MARK.
If his proposal had been deemed legal, you could be driving down the highway and SEE YOUSELF in an ad that you had NEVER BEEN PAID FOR..!!
Of course, it didn’t pass but it really shows you the gall the guy had.
We’re all dedicated Capitalists, but socialist Mark had ideas about ownership that were just completely insane.