Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: okie01
The Obama campaign was so scared of the natural law argument against his eligibility that his operatives removed all references to the Supreme Court case, Minor vs Happersett at Justia.com prior to the election in 2008.

JustiaGate: 'Natural Born' Supreme Court Citations Disappear

MINOR V. HAPPERSETT IS BINDING PRECEDENT AS TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL DEFINITION OF A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

224 posted on 11/19/2016 12:32:39 AM PST by Godebert (CRUZ: Born in a foreign land to a foreign father.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: Godebert
The Obama campaign was so scared of the natural law argument against his eligibility that his operatives removed all references to the Supreme Court case, Minor vs Happersett at Justia.com prior to the election in 2008.

Two things:

1. No Obama operatives were involved. The publisher of Justia confessed to taking it upon himself to remove the references.

2. It was common knowledge that Obama's dad was a foreign national and not a U.S. citizen. Obama had, after all, admitted as much -- in writing (or you might say William Ayers admitted it). Yet, nobody thought to challenge his eligibility on the basis of not having two citizen parents until after the election. Given the thousands of constitutional experts and politically involved people in the US, it seems strange that this detail escaped all of them.

Unless, of course, the argument is a Hail Mary thrown up when there was no proof Obama had been born offshore...

228 posted on 11/19/2016 10:51:27 AM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson