Fox is willing to pay her $20-million a year because she is smart and attractive. I see misogyny is alive and well in this thread.
Weak. We just know what real women are like, we were raised by them and married them
If you were her husband and not embarrassed by this, then you’re the problem
“Fox is willing to pay her $20-million a year because she is smart and attractive. I see misogyny is alive and well in this thread.”
I think the problem MOST (I know not all) posters on here have is the hypocrisy. Personally I think the photo is OK and would be OK but for the context that she was so critical of Trump’s supposed “treatment” of women such as only using them for looks then poses for a photograph intended to emphasize her looks.
“Fox is willing to pay her $20-million a year because she is smart and attractive. I see misogyny is alive and well in this thread.”
Well, NBC paid Katie Couric a lot of money, but that doesn’t mean I thought it was well spent. Dan Rather and Brian Williams collected big paychecks, and they both were losers. It ain’t misogyny, just evaluation.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/26/media/megyn-kelly-rupert-murdoch/index.html
Rupert Murdoch has said that Fox News has a deep bench of talent that would give their right arm for her spot.
Good luck with getting $20 million with her ratings, when they could plug in anyone else and get better.