Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2
Yes, but it should not be a case of one or the other. Whether gubermint run or private initiative, we should be learning how to live off-world at that nice little laboratory so close by. Not to mention the benefits awaiting us there (H3, etc.)
44 posted on 11/13/2016 12:12:01 PM PST by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO! #VICTOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: NonValueAdded
Yes, but it should not be a case of one or the other.

There is simply no choice in most cases since we're not going to send men to Jupiter, or beyond the solar system for a long time. Unmanned spacecraft, not manned spacecraft has and will pave the way for man to travel through interstellar space. And they can stay in space for decades conducting observations, unlike manned spacecraft can do.

And in many cases man won't have any choice but to send unmanned craft because many of these destinations the environments are simply too extreme or too distant for the technology we currently have.

And for the record, I have been calling for a manned exploration base on the lunar surface and Mars for decades. Relatively close destinations such as these are actually doable.

45 posted on 11/13/2016 12:24:25 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson