“Infectious diseases are killers, and can leave survivors profoundly impaired. This is why vaccines were invented, and why they remain an integral part of health management.”
The death rates from “vaccine-preventable” diseases was down about 90-95% on average before vaccination even started.
“There is NO evidence that vaccines cause any sort of neurological problem. “
The Poling family would differ, as would the federal vaccine Court, as do the vaccine product inserts themselves.
That scumbag Paul Offit, who is on your side, once said that it was safe to administer 10,000 vaccines to an infant in one doctor visit. Do you agree with him? What is the safe dose of aluminum for a 7LB baby? And mercury? And aborted fetal tissue?
Looking forward to the day when Dr Wakefield gets his MD license reinstated.
The death rates from “vaccine-preventable” diseases was down about 90-95% on average before vaccination even started.
The fact that modern medicine can save the lives of people who would have died without medical treatment does not mean that getting those deadly diseases is preferable to preventing them in the first place. Why subject a child to a miserable illness and potential life-long disability or death just because some fear-monger (who wants more kids to die) said a bunch of scary stuff about vaccines?
The Poling family would differ, as would the federal vaccine Court, as do the vaccine product inserts themselves.
Hannah Poling's condition was a result of a rare genetic defect that she has that would have caused her to suffer brain damage from *any* febrile illness. She has a mitochondrial abnormality that leaves her extremely susceptible to oxidative damage from any condition that causes energy needs to increase, like a fever. Around one in ten thousand children do develop a fever following the measles vaccine. In her case, unfortunately, the mitochondria were not able to keep up with the increased metabolic needs caused by the immune system's response to the vaccine, and oxidative brain damage resulted. Children with her condition usually show evidence of brain damage between ages 2 and 3. They are recommended to be especially vigilant about taking vaccines, because they are so susceptible to injuries resulting from infectious disease. Blaming the measles vaccine for her brain damage is like blaming the color of a car for the broken bones you suffered when the car hit you.
That scumbag Paul Offit, who is on your side, once said that it was safe to administer 10,000 vaccines to an infant in one doctor visit. Do you agree with him? What is the safe dose of aluminum for a 7LB baby? And mercury? And aborted fetal tissue?
A man who has saved millions of lives and permanent disabilities is a scumbag? Tell me, do you also celebrate the work of abortionists? Of course it would be safe to administer 10,000 vaccines in a single doctor visit--if it weren't for the fact that most of them are delivered through needles, and that many needle pricks in one visit would probably cause quite a bit of damage. The vaccines themselves would not. As I have already pointed out, even if your child received every recommended vaccine during a single doctor visit, the number of antigenic proteins contained in all of those vaccines combined is insignificant next to the number of antigens your kid ingests every time he shoves his dirty little fist into his mouth.
Do you ever wrap food in aluminum foil? If so, then you get a higher dose of aluminum from that food than is contained in any vaccine. If you eat a tuna sandwich, you get far more mercury than is contained in any thiomersal preserved vaccine. You get larger doses of aluminum and mercury in your food every day--why worry about a tiny dose of aluminum or mercury in a vaccine that you might receive three times in a lifetime?
Oh, and there is no fetal tissue in any vaccines.
Looking forward to the day when Dr Wakefield gets his MD license reinstated.
That is extremely unlikely. In the course of his fake research, he mistreated human subjects in a way that is as egregious as the infamous Tuskegee experiments. No review board would have ever condoned his "study" if he had gone through the proper channels to have his study approved. He mistreated children, lied about what he did, and he was motivated by greed. His license was very correctly pulled, since he should not be allowed near patients ever again.