Replies

That’s another funny thing coming from the same centralists “liberals” (what an insult to the word) - suddenly the face of Supreme Court is something to fear.

Well maybe it is - but it was the same libtards who turned the Supreme Court into just another unelected bureaucracy who “decide” for the rest of us “what it’s going to be”.

These unelected Maoists in black robes now become law makers but that is not their role. They are not to write our state legislative laws, our local, state and federal laws. We elect representatives to the Congress to do that. The lower court us then to look at the law and what it says is to be what it says, then look at someone in front of the court and determine “did they do or not do what it says?” ... their role ia not “let me write the law instead of Congress and the people’s representatives”.

Same with the Supreme Court. They are not to write new laws. The constitution isn’t complicated. And it can be amended by the vote and representatives of the peopie.

Not by the Supreme Court.

These unelected robes do not have the right to write laws, write the constitution in their own way. That is not their role. They look at the paper and the words on it, which isn’t very hard to understand and really doesn’t take a genius to “get it” even though some libtards have a problem doing that - and then think, hmmm, “did they do or not do what it says?” ...

But the libtards turned the role of the Court into a role of unelected bureacrats who write the law. The same libtards turned the Court into a monster of central, unelected power.

I don’t give a damn about “court precedent” - that too has become a sick game of depotism and huge populations now scoff at it and say openly, “I don’t give a flying **** what the Supreme Sociopaths say, screw them”. In one way, by means of their own power thumping arrogance and unelected pomp they have not only become a despotic symbol, they have turned themselves into a joke.

So that it what it has come to. Fine.

There is nothing in the Constitution that says there are 9 court justices. At times we had 6. Other times we had 10, then down to 7, other times less and then more ...

So I say Trump nominates 4 more as soon as possible and gets them approved through the majority Republican Congress as soon as possible to bring the number up to 12.

Libtards have a problem with that? After all, too bad, they were the obes giving these unelected robes way too much power to do things they never were supposed to do.

So lets play by their rules.

Folks like me are contacting Trump right now. Contacting our legislatures. We want 12. It’s our constitutional right. It’s right there, in the constitution. We want 12, we can.