Who has been the most accurate, most often?

VANITY | 7 November 2016 | areukiddingme1

[tennmountainman]

Please ask Jim or a member of his staff to confirm your donation on this thread.

[Raycpa]

There's about half a dozen here who actually understand what MOE means.

That is why I call gambling and lotto's a tax on the math challenged.

[lulu16]

I have not put up a vanity, but I just donated to FR. to help others make their thoughts known. Let freedom ring, Freepers.

[backwoods-engineer]

There’s a simple solution: go over to Reddit. They don’t insist on $100 donations to post questions. Good grief.

[Jack Hammer]

None.

[mowowie]

we can vanity anytime we frigging want as long as it’s placed in the general/chat section.

[GregoTX]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3490561/posts

[areukiddingme1]

Got it!

So USC Dornsife/LA Times Poll: 11/07 — Trump 48.0 (- .2), Clinton 43.2 (+ .6) (assuming a +/-3 or 4 MOE) then we really are looking at a Trump win.

If, and the point of my question is, IF USC Dornsife/LA Times/Rand is THE most accurate predictor of presidential races then this is looking pretty good.

[Nifster]

I go with college professor who has called every election for thirty plus years

[catnipman]

"we can vanity anytime we frigging want as long as it’s placed in the general/chat section." that's not what the boss said:

[wireman]

"Their methodology has never been used before"

Not really the case...

https://alpdata.rand.org/?page=election2012

Same methodology, very accurate.

[Nifster]

Ignore all polls

Get Out The Vote

It is time for all hands on deck

[wireman]

I always vote. Just saying that the LA Time (Rand) poll is not new as was erroneously stated above.

[mowowie]

Who are you the hall monitor?
Wanna see my bathroom pass?