[Boomer]

General consensus in its own thread, you can look it up, is it’s a fake tweet.

[MayflowerMadam]

“General consensus in its own thread, you can look it up, is it’s a fake tweet.”

What difference, at this point, does it make?

Whatever it takes to annihilate the Clinton campaign.

[WildHighlander57]

Boomer, Hers a comment; about check mark confirmation that it's a real tweet (also IIRC, green rectangle with black text at top of a wikileak means it was verified) "Matthew K. fake! no check mark verification 10 hours ago•7 Pernicion +Story Parker none of their tweets have the verified checkmark on them. I follow them and I just looked. Wikileaks' tweets show up as verified for me. Plus, the poster of the video didn't bother to provide the link... which seems like a no-brainer. And I looked at Wikileaks twitter feed, and can't find this tweet. Since you follow them, perhaps you'd be so good as to share the link to this tweet? Beyond that though, I think it's fake, because... Wikileaks claims a certain moral high-ground, and threatening a politician unless they leave the race, seems outside their ethos. It seems far more likely, that they would release the information they felt was pertinent, and allow voters to decide for themselves. 8 hours ago•4 Story Parker Matthew K. none of their tweets have the verified checkmark on them. I follow them and I just looked. 9 hours ago•2"