Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VanDeKoik

Makes sense, but to what end? The entire investigation centers around one person, and one Presidential election and that is Clinton being elected. There are no other issues, Did this about face 48 hrs. before help her or hurt her? I am telling you this.......if I were on the fence about voting for Hillary because of email scandals and doubt about her honesty and a twelfth hour announcement came that she had once again been cleared, I would vote for her.


125 posted on 11/06/2016 4:20:47 PM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: Toespi

I guess it would depend on how credible the “clearing” was.


130 posted on 11/06/2016 4:24:02 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

To: Toespi

I dont think there were that many people that were on the fence about her honesty.

If they were supporting her after the original email investigation, they obviously didn’t care about the new one.

And to be honest the numbers didn’t seem to move completely on this.

It’s like those that were shaken about the Trump tape, but not bailing, not caring about the all of the “victims” that feminist lawyer brought forward after.

This “investigation” may have just given people the nudge to go Trump, but it didnt seem like it was the ultimate catalyst one way or the other.

I said on another thread, if they wanted to make a difference, you “clear” her last Tuesday, not 24 hours before the election.


141 posted on 11/06/2016 4:35:16 PM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson