Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vmivol00

Indeed. I do find it interesting that in the letter he states that “...we reviewed all of the communications that were to or from Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State.”

Does that mean that only emails directly from her or to her from 2009 to 2013 were examined? Does that mean other emails to and from staff or emails to or from PIAPS from 2013 onward were NOT looked at, regardless of pertinence?

Just curious.


204 posted on 11/06/2016 1:03:01 PM PST by HombreSecreto (The life of a repo man is always intense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: HombreSecreto

“Does that mean that only emails directly from her or to her from 2009 to 2013 were examined? Does that mean other emails to and from staff or emails to or from PIAPS from 2013 onward were NOT looked at, regardless of pertinence?”

The words were carefully crafted, reviewed, and approved only after careful dissection by the best legal minds DOJ has. Thus the limitations on “all of the communications” to specifically those “to or from [Mrs. Bill] while she was Secretary of State” would mean yes to both your questions.


263 posted on 11/06/2016 1:19:35 PM PST by LibertyOh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson