[STJPII]

The FBI was supposed to destroy the evidence but didn’t. This seems like it could be used against the FBI at a later date

[DAC21]

“The FBI was supposed to destroy the evidence but didn’t. This seems like it could be used against the FBI at a later date

This is what was reported, but there could have been some unreported fine print. As in destroyed at a future date if no contradicting evidence is found, big guess on my part.

[TTFlyer]

Quote:

“The FBI was supposed to destroy the evidence but didn’t. This seems like it could be used against the FBI at a later date”

Don’t have to obey an unlawful order.

Civil War II is underway. The rank-and-file FBI has rebelled against Comey, the Clintons, and Obama. I expect the rank-and-file to prevail.

[Stosh]

“The FBI was supposed to destroy the evidence but didn’t. This seems like it could be used against the FBI at a later date.”

Read on an earlier thread that the agreement to destroy the laptops was part of a deal, and if the other participant in the deal lied about anything to the FBI, the deal was no longer binding. So if the bureau has any evidence of a lie by Mills or such, I expect they can exploit those laptops to their heart’s content.