This is satire, yes?
Mr Frum
Which is more dangerous to the “conservative” political agenda?
A lewd crude bombastic patriot facing a hostile Media and a suspicious Congress/Judiciary or a corrupt lawless bridbe-able radical Leftist narcissist with a slavishly adoring Media and a lap dog Congress/Judiciary?
Another reason to purge all Bushies from the party.
Of course. A "patriot" always treats national security so cavalierly through stunningly shoddy treatment of classified information. Also, let's query Chris Stevens on that "patriot" issue.
She will uphold the sovereignty and independence of the United States. She will defend allies.
What better evidence of this, than skillfully negotiating the Russians to a 10-1 tactical nuclear advantage and cravenly appeasing them by abrogating a missile defense agreement with the Czech Republic and Poland?
She will execute the laws with reasonable impartiality.
LMAO!!!! No further comment needed here.
She may bend some rules for her own and her supporters’ advantage. She will not outright defy legality altogether.
Right.. nothing bears that out more than "pay to play."
Above all, she can govern herself; the first indispensable qualification for governing others.
Is this a ****ing joke? Ask her former Secret Service agents how well she "governs" herself.
Is this satire?
The masks are off, and there will be no going back.
“she(Clinton) is a patriot. She will uphold the sovereignty and independence of the United States. She will defend allies. She will execute the laws with reasonable impartiality. She may bend some rules for her own and her supporters’ advantage. She will not outright defy legality altogether.”
The article is a collection of ridiculous lies.
One of Trump’s greatest accomplishments has been to expose these lying slime balls who dishonestly call themselves conservative.
Left the following comment (I wonder if it will stay?):
To everyone here who thinks Trump is worse than Hillary-
I want to give you a heads up:
The magic words for the next few days are going to be, “Pedophile ring.”
F ake conservative
R at-loving
U npatriotic
M othereffer
Huh? The woman who dreams of a Western Hemisphere with open borders and a common market?
Was Frum partying with Gary Johnson before writing this?
Every one of these statements is shockingly dishonest and absurd. Hillary rejects borders and sovereignty. She rejects the rule of law when dealing with those who have connections. She defies legality altogether, trashing anyone who attempts to enforce the many laws she has broken. She cannot govern herself, continuing to see our our country even now that she has well over $100 million. Hillary is the least qualified major party nominee in history, worse even than Obama because we didn’t know for a fact how evil Obama was at the time, while we know exactly what we would get with Hillary.
What a flaming RINO dipsh*t
There is no conservative case for voting Clinton, but I would not expect a Canadian liberal to know that.
A vote for Hillary is a vote for lawlessness and no sane person, regardless of their political stripe, would vote for her. Alas, most democrats and sanity don’t go together but I would expect better of republicans.
Did "Journalist" James Fallows Supply A Draft Copy Of An Article To The Clinton Campaign?
The Podesta Emails ^ | October 30, 2016 | James Fallows, The Atlantic
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3487033/posts
I get it. You make the “conservative” case for Hillary by first taking LSD, then sitting down to write column.
.
Frum has always been a turd in the punchbowl.
.
The “conservative” case for voting for Clinton is essentially: “A lot of our old friends in government and industry have their hands in the Clinton Foundation’s misdeeds, and outing them would be a tragic disaster. Our gang has everything under control, now. Clinton won’t mess it up. Don’t rock the boat.”