Posted on 11/02/2016 10:06:37 AM PDT by bkopto
But (Hillary Clinton) is a patriot. She will uphold the sovereignty and independence of the United States. She will defend allies. She will execute the laws with reasonable impartiality. She may bend some rules for her own and her supporters advantage. She will not outright defy legality altogether. Above all, she can govern herself; the first indispensable qualification for governing others.
So I will vote for the candidate who rejects my preferences and offends my opinions. (In fact, I already have voted for her.)
(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...
I was just pointing out that the Atlantic has "journos" who are working directly with the Hillary campaign, so it wouldn't surprise me to know that Frum is working with the Hillary campaign, too.
The “conservative” case for voting for Clinton is essentially: “A lot of our old friends in government and industry have their hands in the Clinton Foundation’s misdeeds, and outing them would be a tragic disaster. Our gang has everything under control, now. Clinton won’t mess it up. Don’t rock the boat.”
Isn’t this guy a homo? So should we take voting advice from the mentally ill?
I just heard David Frum referred to as a “conservative”... on NPR.
Yeah, and I’m an Olympic Gold Metal Athlete in 17 different sports.
I also have solved the problem of Quantum Gravity... just haven’t had a chance to publish it yet.
post 11:
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.