I really hate to burst this goofy theory.
But if the Dems wanted to steal an election, they aren’t going to use a poll to “cover” for it.
Like what will someone do, try to submit a poll into evidence at a court trial as proof one way or the other that something did or did not take place?
Harry Truman winning over Dewey would not be overturned because polls said something else.
Why Roger Stone's poll monitoring for the sake of gathering evidence is a little silly. In Pa, with a Democrat Governor, no amount of evidence is going to cause the election results to be overturned. If he wants to prevent fraud I am all for that, but Elliot Nessing at the polls, good luck with that.
I’m am so sorry about the goofiness of your limited insight here.
But that is exactly what the Dems do. And the reason is for there not to be raised suspicions about the theft.
Please try to think a little more clearly and open-mindedly before zipping off simple-minded insults.