Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FlingWingFlyer

Different target requires separate permission. Each has constitutional protection from illegal search and seizure.


15 posted on 10/29/2016 11:06:45 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Raycpa
...Different target requires separate permission...

Why is it taking so long?

A few minutes to type up the application and a few seconds to convince the Judge that the emails are relevant to the case against Hil and Huma.

39 posted on 10/29/2016 11:26:25 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Raycpa

This is confusing for several reasons. Humma Wiener said she gave all of her email devices to her lawyer to turn over to the FBI. If true, then these emails were on Carlos Danger’s machine. If the New York PD found classified emails on his computer, aren’t they obligated to notify the FBI? Then the FBI would be obligated to trace the source of those classified emails. In doing that, would they need to get a warrant if the NYPD already had a warrant for the content of Wiener’s machine? Or would the FBI need an additional warrant because this discovery was incidental to the target of the NYPD warrant? If the police get a warrant to search your computer for child porn, and they find state secrets your wife had accidentally transferred there, they can’t do anything about it until they get another warrant to investigate those? That doesn’t sound right, either.

I get the feeling that Humma didn’t realize her husband’s computer was cloud synced with hers.


50 posted on 10/29/2016 11:36:35 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson