Just disgusting that destroying evidence would ever be a part of a deal. What does that have to do with granting immunity? Is there any other case where granting immunity included destruction of evidence?
52 posted on 10/28/2016 2:41:20 PM PDT by JediJones
(Social conservatism is the root of all conservatism.)
For the agents so instructed to destroy evidence, it's always so much lesser of an offense just to say you destroyed it than actually to have done it, just in case it ever becomes part of a lawsuit! This is just savvy practice among FBI guys.