re fraud factor:
I understand both NYT and WSJ have had to cover the fraud emails from WikiLeaks. This is huge. Our prog clients refuse to accept anything not covered by these outlets. One of the more arrogant ones has gone silent this week on the election (RINO voting for Hillary).
It just may be that with all this attention on the mechanics of the fraud, including a recent whistleblower from Florida (Broward County?), the fraud itself will be lessened.
We may have lucked out. Timing is on our side. Now, any faithless elector purchased by Soros may need to cover their rumps if their state goes to Trump by a decent percentage. Soros actually bragged on tape about controlling electors. It may not fly under the radar this time.
I pray that you are correct.
I had to look up the soros quote because that would be huge news if true. Snopes says it’s a doctored tape of a Jan 2016 interview with soros. I am also a skeptic when it comes to snopes.
Now I hate soros and would like nothing more than to find a way to discredit him but only if it’s true. I refuse to play the lib-prog game of saying the same lie over and over again until people believe it.
It was discussed on Jeff Kuhner's show the other day, and I need to 2nd source it, and that is, by Federal Law, if you ask for a paper ballot, they must comply.
So ask for them in the 16 states.
Now, all this flappadoodle about Russia via Hilda?
Smoke and Mirrors, she is covering for Soro's since Russia has warrants out for that old crotchety bastard's arrest and what greater way for Trump to build a relationship with Putin than to hand him over IMHO.
Maybe on the 2nd day of the DJT Admin, you know line up the Jet, getting the team in place to arrest him, works for me....