Posted on 10/27/2016 7:03:47 PM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
"Here's an independent statistical analysis of my race against Debbie Wasserman Schultz, concluding that the official primary results are "mathematically implausible" and suggesting possible manipulation in the vote tabulation. Should we manually counts ballots in our elections? These researchers say yes."
http://www.hollerbackfilm.com/blog/wass-can
Fascinating read. The statistical analysis was quite impressive and points to fraud.
From the study:
In the race between Wasserman Schultz and Canova, that does not happen (Figure 2). As more and more votes are added in, instead of the pattern approaching the average level of support for each candidate (a flat line) Wasserman Schultz’ percentage climbs continuously in a mathematically precise pattern, and Canova’s percentage decreases steadily. We will discuss later in the post exactly how precise the pattern is. This is not the expected statistical pattern. This graph is by Anselmo Sampietro, a mathematician who holds a Master of Statistics degree from the University of Bologna, Italy.
Debbie ‘Sergeant’ Schultz: “I know nothing...NOTHING!”
a Dumocrat committing election fraud is mandatory practice. I think it’s page 4 of the DNC guidelines..
I’m gonna post the study as a separate thread tomorrow. It is a very strong indicator of election rigging that is subtle and virtually undetectable except for an in-depth analysis.
There’s a high degree of plausibility for fraud in favor of Wasserman-Schultz.
That would be excellent. It was fascinating and compelling regarding the larger population areas.
Which devil is the worse — the fraudster; or the honest communist who wants to plunder private businesses?
It might sound odd, but Bernie and Trump are kindred spirits. Both understand that the game is corrupt, and rigged. Both understand that the establishment exists only to protect itself.
In a perfect world, Bernie and all of his supporters would be voting for Trump.
Determine the fraud
Then apply what was learned, and apply it to the general election.
DemoRATS aren't inherently intelligent, but they are METHODICAL !!
The fraudster is worse due to his evil intent.
However, once the commie has carte blanche to plunder, he is highly susceptible to corruption.
Do you prefer a termite or a carpenter ant to devour your framing?
Yes, people rag at me for posting older fraud articles from the last elections. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. It’s almost always too late to reverse the outcome after an election.
1. They prototype their schemes in the primaries.
2. They typically repeat whatever fraud was undetectable or unprovable or was not prosecuted from 2014, 2012, 2008, 2004, etc.
THAT’S A GREAT IDEA
God Forbid the beast wins with fraud, DONT concede until the same statistical analysis is done.
We must be prepared for the probability that even if DJT does not concede, they will proceed with the swearing in process. They have Roberts, remember.
Here is something you may be interested in hearing, dp0622:
from the 11:30 to 15:50 mark:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=At3gdna4wbg
I am thinking this trend may already be detectable if the program is in place. This could be solved by swapping devices. Let them know we are looking for this irregularity and prevent its installation.
Interesting 4 minutes. ANY of those moves and we must take action.
I’ve thought all along that they would do WHATEVER it took to keep Trump out.
So far they’re failing. Let’s pray they keep failing.
There’s a lot of guns in America. And from what I read here, people who know how to use them.
I PRAY it NEVER comes to that and that a peaceful transition of power to Trump is what happens.
We shall see.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
