I lived in Jacksonville, Florida, a coastal city,for four years. That city is as conservative as any in Texas, and more so than Dallas, Houston, or San Antonio. I saw more Rebel flags in northeast Florida and south Georgia in four years than I saw in Texas in the previous 20 years. Pensacola (on the Gulf of Mexico) is at least as conservative as Amarillo or Lubbock. I have relatives in South Carolina and Georgia, and they were unreconstructed for sure. Don’t forget South Carolina was the first to leave the Union, well before Texas or Arkansas. South Florida, northern Virginia, and the Richmond area are liberal hellholes, admittedly. But the South Atlantic states, a few pockets notwithstanding, is conservative and patriotic.
And, to be blunt, that IS “the US East coast” by any sptretch of the matter. Jacksonville IS a valid and important nuclear target - IF the attacker wanted to attack the US militarily as a US Navy base and airbase.
But to a terrorist - who ARE attcking the US with Obola’s nuclear weapons?
No. Does not even come up on their list of 100 targets. The cities attacked by terrorists - who ARE the threat and NOT this unidentified “Russian threat” of this news media propagandized piece! - are the democrat cities of New York, Boston, Washington DC. Maybe Philly - because of the Liberty Bell if nothing else. Not even Orlando is attractive as a nuclear terror target - It’s too far away. Too much associated as a”Mickey Mouse” land.