Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pre-crime returns to America with new Airbnb law
Sovereign Man ^ | 24 October 2016 | Simon Black

Posted on 10/26/2016 9:13:12 AM PDT by Lorianne

On Friday afternoon, New York state Governor Andrew Cuomo signed a bill making it illegal to advertise your home for short-term rent on websites like Airbnb.

The law specifically targets New York City homeowners in apartment buildings who advertise their properties, or even just a spare room in their homes, to rent for less than 30 days at a time.

It’s important to note that New York already passed a law a few years ago making it illegal to rent your home out to short-term tenants.

This new law makes it illegal to ADVERTISE… which is basically pre-crime.

Now you don’t even need to commit the egregiously criminal act of renting out your home to a nightly traveler.

Simply informing the public that you’re thinking about it is enough to get slammed with a major fine.

Violations carry a penalty of up to $7,500, dramatically higher than New York’s penalty for reckless driving (up to $300) and even higher than the fine for driving while intoxicated (between $500 and $5,000).

I’m sure we can all sleep more soundly tonight knowing that the courageous politicians of New York are keeping the streets safe from nefarious criminal terrorists trying to earn a few extra bucks from their own private properties.

It’s ironic that New York City already has one of the highest hotel occupancy rates in the world, in excess of 90% in some parts of the city like Times Square.

(Which makes New York one of the only places in the world where a 2-star fleabag like the Comfort Inn can command rates between $249 and $429/night.)

So websites like Airbnb fill an obvious market need.

Last year alone, Airbnb generated $451 million for New York City property owners who rented their apartments or spare rooms to short-term travelers.

That’s 451 million reasons to continue allowing Airbnb to operate in the city.

Everyone wins. Hotels still have high occupancy. Property owners generate supplementary income. Travelers have a better experience in the city. And politicians get their tax slice of $451 million.

But now they’ve screwed up a perfectly good thing that was creating plenty of benefit.

Naturally, they’re citing ‘public safety’ as their primary justification. They can get away with anything if has to do with safety and security.

The text of the legislation states that they must “ensure that all buildings comply with fire, building and other safety codes relative to their class.”

Right. Because renting your apartment to a retired couple who flew into town to see Hamilton means that the entire building will burn down to the ground?

This is really some next level logic.

Driving home the political delusion, State Senator Liz Krueger released a statement in favor of the law, calling it

“a huge victory for regular New Yorkers over the interests of a thirty-billion dollar corporation.”

(Big Sister Krueger also encourages New Yorkers to rat each other out to the authorities should they find one of their neighbors violating the law.)

If this person actually had a clue about anything, she’d realize that Airbnb has NEVER generated a profit and has lost billions of dollars since it was founded.

So this ‘victory’ is against the regular New Yorkers she claims to protect– ordinary people who use the site to generate extra income and help make ends meet in one of the most expensive cities in the world.

SNP


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Lorianne

I guess I will remove New York City from my places to visit after my vacation in Kibera Kenya.


21 posted on 10/26/2016 12:36:56 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Hillary Clinton, the elderly woman's version of "I dindu nuffins.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Bring in the era of “Sleep Easys”

You’ll have to sneak around looking for bootleg beds.


22 posted on 10/26/2016 12:38:26 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Hillary Clinton, the elderly woman's version of "I dindu nuffins.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Hmm...sounds like an opportunity to open up a deepnet website advertising housing with no restrictions!

I could also service all the people who can’t advertise things like “not suitable for handicapped persons” or “must be able to live independently.” These simple, factual phrases among many others are ‘discrimination’ and will get your butt kicked if you use them in advertising your apartment/home.


23 posted on 10/28/2016 5:27:21 AM PDT by Laser_Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson