But she can be stopped: just be sure to get out and VOTE FOR TRUMO!
Typo, sorry.
VOTE FOR TRUMP
“Hillary Clinton repeatedly has said she’s not here “to take your guns away,””
Sorta reminds me of some Black guy telling us a few years ago: “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor”.
She and her husband belongs to a group of people I wouldn’t trust in an empty basement.
i wanna see this dizzy bitch perp walked in a nice orange pant suit.
But she can be stopped: just be sure to get out and VOTE FOR TRUMO!
Pretty sure everyone here is voting for Trumo.
... Mrs. Clinton frequently calls for new gun safety measures....
The “Gun control” push failed. So, in a typical finge lunatic liberal manner they call it something else and try again.
Last Sunday at church, a gentleman (who is also a very vocal Never Trumper) was handing out flyers for an upcoming protest at a new planned parenthood clinic launch. My wife who is a staunch defender of the unborn, eagerly took the flyer from him. I took the flyer from her, and handed it back to the gentleman, and told him that protecting life with the ballot was more effective that protesting in front of a clinic.
If (God Forbid it!) the Hildabeast wins, I swear I will kick any never Trumper’s ass, if they complain about any violation of their constitutional rights, or the rights of the unborn.
“Don’t kid yourself, she is coming for your guns.”.........
I hope she comes in person, I will gladly hand it to her .
Smokescreen language. Anytime someone puts it in terms of "...safety..." or "...common sense gun laws..." etc. it is complete and utter BS. Study after study shows that private gun ownership improves safety, while places with the most restrictive "gun control" laws are the least safe. The so-called common sense laws are mere stepping stones to complete bans and confiscation.
Look, even the dullest politicians, the most ardent socialists, the most committed fascists out there - like Clinton or bammy - know that to attempt to ban private firearms ownership or confiscate firearms in a single step would ignite a second civil war. The resulting insurgency against the fascists, in our varied terrain, with the number of private firearms, and the amount of information available would make Iraq look like a Church picnic.
So they know they cannot ban private firearms - yet. But they can chip away with ineffective "gun control" laws. "All we need to do is restrict A and we'll be safer..." All the while knowing this idiocy is completely ineffective. Then "There's still too much violence, we need to ban A..." Well duh, you're disarming the law-abiding while criminals get an ever more helpless potential victim pool... "Still too much violence, we need to restrict B...ban B...restrict C...ban C..." Where if you look around the Country and the world you see A, B, C, etc. can be any combination of things like magazine capacity, handguns, semi-automatics, "assault weapons," pistol grips, removable magazines, "universal" background checks... Just chip chip chipping away... All part of the plan.
...as she reassures law-abiding Americans their firearms won’t be targeted under her would-be administration...
Of course not. But once they pass a law or implement an executive order, people owning those firearms are no-longer "law-abiding" they are now in criminal violation - and targeted.
While many Democrats long have been labeled as anti-gun, firearms advocates say Mrs. Clinton’s position is especially disingenuous.
"Especially disingenuous..." Oh, that's the funniest thing I've read all day! (yeah, it's early) Clinton is provably a lying POS that can't be trusted with pocket change.
Any bets on how many days in office before she orders the BATFE to institute universal confiscation...?
i do not like the term gun right, which is being transformed into a pejorative by liberals and separated from other human rights. It should be a civil right, as in “armed defense civil right.”