Why would she say this even if it were true?
I discuss this in the linked thread.
The Clinton phony female charges has her jumpy on turnout—but she has no valid basis for her view imho.
“Why would she say this even if it were true?”
That’s what I was thinking!
Why would she say this even if it were true:
#1 GOTV
#2 Fundraise
Hillary Clinton ran $66 million in September. That moves the dial. Trump is putting ads up in the battleground states. Hillary’s has a lot more money and is running unanswered ads in non-battleground states. Trump has put $100 million into this campaign. Maybe he needs to put some more in. Maybe all of us who can need to.
Kellyanne shifted from the national poll numbers to the state polls in the battleground states. Those polls show us within reach of winning. We’re behind but only by a few points in the states we have to win.
BTW here’s what they say when they’re so far behind they have no chance of winning. “The only poll that counts is in November.” Kellyanne didn’t say that.
All about turnout.
Raise Trump intensity,deflate Clinton voters with overconfidence?
To keep the pressure on for support. If she were to come out and say something different at this point, it could suppress support. Also, do you believe the national polling the media is touting? First of all, there’s national polls and state-by-state polls. Second of all, would Hillary and company be campaigning in Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania and North Carolina if she was so far ahead? Third of all, there’s still two + weeks left. A lifetime in a volatile race.
Why would she say this even if it were true?
Because the 2% that he’s ahead right now isn’t enough to cover the approximately 3-4% impending fraudulent votes.
When Trump is up 5% in the polls he’ll win by 1%+. Pedal to he metal.