I do believe some shenanigans took place to compromise Justice John Roberts in a few of his decisions.
However, I also wish that the accusers took the time to get their facts straight as it distracts from their message. The Roberts family includes two adopted children: one daughter, and one son [not two daughters]. Also it is inferred that the adoption was somewhat irregular. I remember when Roberts was nominated that some on the left were saying that there was something off about the adoption from Argentina. Their inference was that Roberts and his wife went to Argentina to adopt so they could get white infants.
I am not certain whether any of this is true, but the adoption issue seems to be coming forth again.
Is it inferred or implied? Who "inferred" it?
Their inference
Inference or implication? Who's "inference" and why should you believe them?