I think a little bit of intellectual honesty is in order here. There is no chance that she's going to be denied her run for the White House because she's a criminal and there is no chance, as far as we know now, that Hillary will be impeached if elected-unless new evidence of egregious crimes in the form of a smoking gun emerges. But, what's good for the Donald is good for the Levin.
Can we not grant Levin that he might be motivated by good intentions, using impeachment as another way to attack Hillary, just as Trump is using Hillary's criminality to attack her candidacy? At least can we fairly say he is operating consistently to his principles as a constitutional conservative? That's what we constitutional conservatives do, we seek to find the constitutional remedy. I have already noted in another post, Levin's splendid record of putting trustworthy conservatives on the air to advance their candidacy (Dave Bratt comes to mind for one) and other candidates even though in many cases the odds were long that they would be elected. So it is with the argument over impeachment, so it is with the Article V movement -both are longshots, both are constitutionally sanctioned, both are praiseworthy.
Finally, how do we advance Trump's chances by denigrating Levin who is doggedly, 20 hours a week, attacking Hillary?
Vote TRUMP!
