This is a typical “intellectual” conservative tactic.
Rant and rave about an unresolvable issue in order to keep their followers riled up. All the while opposing someone that advocates a course of action that actually has some possibility of success.
Because the advocate isn’t “pure” enough.
No, because the advocate is not their personal choice. Mark Levin is an incredibly selfish man. I’ve never heard Levin utter a negative word about his gold boy, Saint Ted of Goldman, despite plenty of issues.
I’ve never heard him utter a positive word about Trump, save for being able to manipulate Trump on judicial appointments, while he can’t expect to pull Hillary’s strings.
Mark Levin is a putz.