Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clay Moore

.
>> “In the past, ratings were made up, at best.” <<

In the ‘60s horsepower was deliberately under rated to keep insurance costs down.
.


69 posted on 10/21/2016 8:48:07 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

Only a few were under rated. Most were NOT delivering the advertised hp to the flywheel.

Most ratings were bare motor without accessories or mufflers running with modified carburetors and undriviable tunes.


73 posted on 10/21/2016 9:00:12 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor

By the mid-sixties, the advertised outputs of many bread-and-butter engines were still unrealistically high,

http://ateupwithmotor.com/terms-technology-definitions/gross-versus-net-horsepower/


76 posted on 10/21/2016 9:07:34 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson