Posted on 10/21/2016 6:34:00 PM PDT by Kaslin
Its funny coming from the same people who are experts in stealing elections and who don’t accept election results that aren’t in their favor.
I didn’t see Krauthammer attack them.
This way the MSM doesn’t have to discuss Hillary’s massive failure at the debate. It just slides down the memory hole.
Krauthammer was just on MeGyn Kelly saying is not going to vote for Trump. Charles, the former Walter Mondale staffer, has his principles you see!
I don’t know. For some reason I missed all this MSM hysteria.More faux postering and huffing and puffing by the Clinton propaganda express. Put the news cycle on Trump though again, hehehe,and then the alternative and true media showed the history of Democrats claiming voter fraud.
No but we all saw krautheimer dining at wills home in 08 and then saying he seemed reasonable. What a jerk.
Many of us here were not...we knew that as far as the reporting was going to go, that response was going to be the only thing that happened that whole debate...their behavior was typical and all too predictable.
Well, to me it’s pretty simple. When H. asks him if he’ll accept the outcome “if he loses”, it’s tantamount to asking him if he concedes the election, on the spot, in psychological terms. It’s a ploy. So he he says wait and see, i.e. “No, I’m not conceding”, and then they go nuts. Hopefully this redounds in his favor.
I think Wallace was told to ask that question....just seems out of character to me.
I am starting to get nervous about FOX....
Lou Dobbs had a good discussion ,,,bit heated with bill O Reilly tonight, would be nice to get the transcript of that posted. thanks for posting this.
Quote:
“Krauthammer was just on MeGyn Kelly...”
“Nightmare On Fox Street” starring two cadaverous talking-heads. Shudder......
Evidently Lou went slumming tonight.
This is one of the best graphics I’ve seen AND is TRUTH!
bookmark
C.K. never had enough testosteron to miss the use of his extremities.
The democrats will keep demanding more and more recounts until their preferred candidate magically gains enough votes, then they’ll demand that the process be halted immediately and the winner declared.
“F” the democrats! Every single one of them can ESAD.
And remember when Chris Wallace asked Illary if she’d accept a loss and concede?
Oh, that’s right...
I listened to Rush’s entire analysis of the media attack on Trump over the issue of accepting election results...it clearly was an trap question designed to hit Trump regardless what he said. If agreed to accept the results, he acknowledged that Hillary would win and if he did not agree to accept the results, he was breaking hundreds of years of tradition. What a f’n setup! And Rush explained it perfectly as usual..............
“And remember when Chris Wallace asked Illary if she’d accept a loss and concede?
Oh, that’s right...”
Exactly. Also the Anderson direct question to Trump in the previous debate about women. All setups to try and trap Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.