Posted on 10/20/2016 3:11:20 PM PDT by detective
Tonight, during the presidential debate, pro-abortion presidential candidate Hillary Clinton defended partial birth abortions on babies late in pregnancy. She said that she didnt think the government should be stepping in to protect unborn children that late in pregnancy.
Despite factual information showing that partial birth abortions happen in most cases on healthy babies and healthy mothers, Clinton claimed that killing unborn children in partial birth abortions was necessary because of supposed special cases where abortion was necessary to save the life or health of the mother even though considerable research has documented the fact that abortions often hurt and kill women.
(Excerpt) Read more at lifenews.com ...
Partial birth abortion is the brutal and barbaric killing of an innocent child.
Clinton has always supported it.
She also supports allowing babies already born to be killed.
She is simply evil.
It’s pathetic that these Democrat statists all of sudden turn into ardent libertarians when it comes to government intervening in preventing the murder of babies. They want government involved in every other aspect of our lives including the beverages we drink.
All we are asking for is common sense restrictions on access to .50 cal. abortions...
But, the guy mint always steps in when murder is committed.
The Gov’t shouldn’t step i.....except to pay for abortions with tax payer money. Right, Hillary?
You better believe a lot of women had no idea of the details of a partial birth abortion. They do now and it is really turning them off.
Heck, there are those in the elite academia who believe a woman should be able to take a baby home for up to 30 days before deciding whether to keep it or end its life. Margaret Sanger would be especially proud of Cankles.
Hillary Clinton Defends Partial-Birth Abortions As A Means Of Birth Control For Recreational Sex
I wonder why she didn’t abort her daughter, Chelsea.
The gov’t shouldn’t step in. ...except to pay for abortions with tax payer money, right, Hillary?
The gov’t shouldn’t step in. ...except to pay for abortions with tax payer money, right, Hillary?
She’s evil but this also isn’t a federal issue either. This is a state issue. The federal governments purpose has nothing to do with abortions or 90% of the shit it’s involved in.
[Its pathetic]
What is pathetic are the “CHRISTIANS” who will not vote for DONALD TRUMP, a pro-life Presidential candidate who has vowed to name Pro-life, Pro U.S. Constitution JUDGES to the SUPREME COURT.
With their non-vote they will be voting for ABORTION candidate HILLARY CLINTON
They will be held accountable.
Stay focused. The fetus is a person. It is murder.
There have been about 60 million babies killed in the womb by abortion since Roe vs. Wade in 1973.
There have somewhere around 100,000 deaths by gunshot since 1973 - intentional and accidental.
That’s 600 babies killed for each gun death.
Yet Hillary Clinton supports abortion but wants to eliminate private gun ownership.
I just watched “Heaven is for Real” again on DVD. The kid who has the near death experience meets his older sister in heaven. However, his older sister was a miscarriage and he had no idea that she even existed until he had this experience. His mother was doubtful that his NDE was real until he came up to her one day and told her that he had met his older sister.
The human fetus is fully human with a soul. Abortion is taking of a human life, no ifs and or buts about it, at ANY time after conception. I really think that those have abortions, those who support abortion, and especially those who do abortions are going to come face to face with those souls whose lives they terminated simply for convenience, or worse yet, profit.
I believe I read that Hillary had been told she had to have a kid to appear more human. It has always been ALL ABOUT THE POLITICAL PRKS. I suspect that’s why Chelsea has two kids.....and her husband Is about as unhappy with his life as he could be, if you look at his expressions whenever he is caught on camera.
Question I wonder is how many abortions she's had.
Hillary doesn’t want government getting involved in people’s lives? Government shouldn’t step in to stop defenseless human beings to be killed?
But she’s fine with government stepping in to: make us wear seatbelts, making sure calorie counts are on fast food menus, forcing us to use certain light bulbs, forcing us to recycle, mandating daycare toddlers in Massachusetts teeth brushing.....
I agree. Clinton is doing evil.
Amen
If the feds shouldnt interfere with abortion as Hillary is hypocritically claiming, then the feds shouldnt be funding abortions, especially since the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution the specific power to appropriate taxes for funding abortions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.