Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MMaschin

Did she give up accurate information, or was she merely trying to sound as if she knows something? I’m not ever impressed with anonymous sources, especially those who then claim Hilliary’s comment was accurate.


92 posted on 10/20/2016 10:43:41 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: SoldierDad
Did she give up accurate information, or was she merely trying to sound as if she knows something? I’m not ever impressed with anonymous sources, especially those who then claim Hilliary’s comment was accurate.

How am I supposed to know, the information is classified.

Plus, it doesn't matter if the information is accurate or not, even lying about classified information, if you hold security access to it, is illegal. Imagine if you were only allowed to prosecute someone if the information they publicly divulged, was accurate - no one would be prosecuted, because the act of prosecuting would be further confirmation of the data that was divulged.

Anyone who has security clearance and divulges accurate, or inaccurate information, without approval, NEEDS to be considered an extreme security risk, and prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
96 posted on 10/20/2016 10:52:45 AM PDT by MMaschin (The difference between strategy and tactics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson