Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pollster1

And yet, if she breaks into tears on national TV over the incompetence that led to her son’s death, there is no positive response the evil tyrant can give that will balance that effect. She could dominate the news cycle (as long as her Internet history is clean!).


True.

But her anger at Hillary (fully justified BTW) is intense.

My concern is that she loses it and storms the stage to try to get at Hillary.

Couldn’t blame her if she did


16 posted on 10/19/2016 10:12:34 AM PDT by rdcbn ("There is no means of avoiding a final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: rdcbn
But her anger at Hillary (fully justified BTW) is intense.

When someone murders your child to further her own career, I'd agree that anger is justified. As long as she handles it well, that's a good thing.

22 posted on 10/19/2016 10:40:36 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: rdcbn

“My concern is that she loses it and storms the stage to try to get at Hillary.

Couldn’t blame her if she did”

And I do not believe most Americans would blame her either.

Even the low info voters would wonder why the woman did it, and would inevitably find out about her plight. Then more would leave the Hillary camp, as I believe anyone who knows what happened to her son, and the way Hillary lied to her, would not and could not keep supporting Hillary.


23 posted on 10/19/2016 10:53:07 AM PDT by walkingdead (It's easy, you just don't lead 'em as much....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson