Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pangaea6

Here is the difference for those preferring to be negative. The shear volume of the Wikipedia emails and the video make this information empirical.

We are rapidly approaching a point where the issue will no longer be Hillary or Trump, but media people will be facing a choice which directly relates to their credibility in the future. If they wish to stay in the media they will have to play it straight. The data at this point simply overwhelms whatever bias they can credibly make work anymore.

A Politico reporter admitted in an email today to Podesta that he is a hack. It is over for him. Nobody wants to look like a fool, even liberals.

The future of the media is now on the line.


124 posted on 10/17/2016 6:59:21 PM PDT by chriscraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: chriscraft

The future of the media is now on the line.

yes and because of this one sided reporting new media outlets can take their place just look what happened to NFL..we have power power of the purse
fox murdoch’s kids better wake up or they will be facing real competition, Trump and his supporters could build a competing network..fox stock will drop like a rock
let their investor relations know we are watching them closely. they ae publicly traded and subject to whims of the market and short sellers...

http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/fox/interactive-chart


144 posted on 10/17/2016 7:13:35 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson