Their margins may vary, but every poll shows Hillary comfortably up.
What exactly are you talking about? Both Rasmussen and the LA Times poll have Trump in the lead, not “comfortably” as you say but their samples don’t seem to be skewed.
“every poll shows Hillary comfortably up. “
That is an obvious lie. Even the ABC poll has them tied within MOE.
Rasmussen, Daybreak and PPD have Trump ahead
You thought Romney would win in 2012 because Karl Rove kept predicting a Romney landslide on Fox News.
What poll ?.
Conveniently forgot today that
La times has trump ahead
Rasmssen has trump ahead
Pundits poll has Trump ahead
In 2012 , Barry the Muslim was the incumbent .
Why not use 2000 ?..
Stop peddling the DNC media narrative here
Troll elsewhere .
You are talking nonsense...No every poll does not show Hillary comfortably up.
La Times tracking poll has Trump ahead
New Wash Post poll has Hillary up 4 (4 is within the margin of error)
Just cut it out, it’s nonsense what you’re saying
Romney did have it. He just didn’t have it enough to beat fraud. Trump has it enough to beat fraud.
I did too, because of the results being published by Gallup, a firm that has been polling presidential elections successfully since 1936. They had it 49% Romney, 48% Obama. Gallup has since given up on presidential election polling.
I would suggest that if Gallup has concluded that accurate presidential election polling can't be done in 2012 using 1936 methodology, that one should be wary of ALL polls in 2016 that are still using 1936 methodology.
No they do not. The last 5 polls out are Trump +2 (Rasmussen), Trump +2 (PPD), Trump +1 (LA Times), Clinton +4 (WaPost), Clinton +11
I was wondering how long before one of you ‘but Romney lost in 2012’ showed up!
And even with skewed internals, so get your facts right.