Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomNotSafety

So where is justice in making one innocent man financially responsible for the fraud of a woman, and the wrong act of another man?
Is the need of the child so great that it demands grave injustice be inflicted on an innocent man?

Totally sick.


28 posted on 10/15/2016 8:28:57 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

Justice would rely on remedies against the mother would they not? The child did not perpetrate the fraud.

The ancient reason for marriage was to have and raise children. Ancient societies, heck even our own until the leftist took over, wanted more people because populous countries tended to be more powerful. Even Russia and Poland are today starting to enforce pro-natal policies.

So the laws were written as to what was best for encouraging women to have children. Mission accomplished.

We make sure a women is compensated for having a child no matter the circumstances and no matter who pays. The husband, the bio dad, or uncle sugar (me and you as tax payers) will pay her.


32 posted on 10/15/2016 8:47:04 AM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRhino
So where is justice in making one innocent man financially responsible for the fraud of a woman, and the wrong act of another man?

The billions of dollars that could have supported the MRAs who are fighting paternity fraud made expensive prostitutes and abusive pimps rich instead.

33 posted on 10/15/2016 9:00:30 AM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (Clinton's actions speak louder than Trump's words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson