“You bought into a fraudulent conspiracy theory.”
Actually, I did not buy into any “theory”. I simply did my own independent research, and none of the evidence I see remotely indicates that the official narrative is believable.
What is the difference between a “fraudulent conspiracy theory” and a “legitimate conspiracy theory”?
Given the stakes involved, the folks who are here defending the official SH narrative should use much stronger verbage. How about “double bad fraudulent bat$hit-crazy kitten-killing conspiracy theory”?
You didn’t do any independent research. You watched a lot of YouTube videos of folks who had no idea what they were talking about and you believed it.
A fraudulent conspiracy theory is one where all major aspects of it are based on errors.