Posted on 10/14/2016 7:20:52 AM PDT by NYRepublican72
E-mail 9272 folks.
I think the point can be made via noting that Sid was not a federal employee as needed (which as FYI means his emails only b/came federal records if used in the course of Dept business - so some were if forwarded and acted on and some weren't if nothing was done with them). But not sure it is worth the technical debate.
So in your if pushed, you could say:
>>> With regard to his materials, remember, Sid was never a federal employee. We do not know what these materials are, or where they came from. Just take a look at them: many of the documents are not even formatted as emails. >>> >>> But even if Sid is right and some of these documents were at some point sent to Clinton, there is nothing in any of these emails that is remotely new or interesting. Indeed, none of these 16 emails are qualitatively different than the dozens of others that Hillary already produced to the State Department. So it is completely ridiculous to suggest that there might have been any nefarious basis for her to want to delete any of Sid's correspondence.
>> cdm
(Excerpt) Read more at wikileaks.org ...
A hacker tweet who says someone has the 33K emails,.....
They don't need to find them, they are out there. Foreign entities, multinational corporations and the NSA have everything that was on Hillary's servers. They are holding onto them in case she wins the election so that they can use them for leverage. They are potentially worth billions of dollars. If Trump wins they are worth nothing.
As voters we want someone who shares at least some of our values to be President. The people who have her emails and other information want someone who can be controlled. If the candidate is corrupt they like that even better because that guarantees they can be controlled. As far as the powers that be are concerned Hillary is a $5 whore who will do anything that they ask.
So I doubt whether the “deleted emails” will be released. They are worth too much to those who have them and it is like an investment that they are holding onto. It will be an act of God if they are released before the election.
I am not completely sure what is going on with Wikileaks, but I suspect the trickle is not for maximum effect but is merely the application of steady pressure to manipulate some type of concessions out of the Clinton's before the election. Assange is probably getting pretty tired of being holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy. At least Snowden is able to basically have some freedom of movement.
Hmm....see #59,,,,
Help an old Freeper here. When I try the links I get:
404 Not Found
nginx/1.2.4
Are you saying this woman’s server is being ‘cleansed’?
Thanks
Dave
The info in #59 has been out for nearly a week. As I said in my post, I do not doubt that her servers were hacked and that several entities have everything that was on them. But that information is being held on to so that it can be used to manipulate her if she is elected.
I am sure that the Chinese have it all, but do you think that they are going to help get Trump elected? Most multinational corporations would hold on to them as well. The Russians are a wild card. There is the possibility that a group unaffiliated with a foreign government has them but these groups are likely to look out for their own best interests which means selling them to the highest bidder.
So try again ....
what is you particulars of your Internet connection and your rig?
LOL How appropriate! Like the MFM, they were fixated.
Another one bites the dust.
OK...thanks...I have been off doing other stuff so not really up to date,....
If Trump had any decent republican surrogates they’d all be out there saying “We have reason to believe these emails show Hillary was running guns through Benghazi.” When they’re asked what evidence they have they can say “Harry Reid told us.”
HTML that is,
Got it. Anything that challenges your bubble world dogmas is not “proof” Emails FROM THE CLINTONITES showing the corruption and collusion is not “proof”. Vague allegations, all ready proven fraudlent about Trump, however, ARE “PROOF” in your world.
Way too retarded for a response. Catch up before you consider yourself a FReeper.
LOCK HER UP!
#5 Dr.Dude: Re your comment. If Hillary was discussing US foreign policies over an UNSECURE EMAIL SERVER and with someone who was NOT a government employee (with a security clearance), then this is very serious and prosecutable.
Obama used the son of a Soviet asset, probable KGB asset, Simon Malley, as a secret contract with Syria’s dictator Assad, possibly the father. This son was later either on the staff of a govt agency or an organization that was used as a conduit to foreign governments.
Lots of security risks and leaks all around.
Sid Bluementhal was making an OIL DEAL for the Clintons...
HILLARY MURDERS KHADAFFY br> THE JIAHDIS CUT THE CLINTONS IN ON OIL CONCESSIONS via one of the clinton foundaiton cronies of course... nothing direct
SHE LIVED UP TO HER PART OF THE BARGAIN.. >br> WAITING .... WAITING .... to see who ISIS sells its oil to or via...
POPCORN PLEASE ...
KA..CHING .... RACK UP ANOTHER BILLION FOR THE CLINTONS.... BILLIONS PER YEAR THAT IS ...
they let slow joe biden set his son up in the oil biz in the ukraine... joe is a sucker for a shitedeal... the clintons play in the big leagues... with their foundaiotn billions...
Article, and # 11 .
.
Links are bad Ernest. But with all the stuff at this site and elsewhere on the criminal gang it is just one bit more piece of info to add to the whole criminal enterprise the Clinton’s have been participating in for so many years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.