[Sasparilla]

If this is actual video of Clinton and a child, it is child porn. Possession or viewing child porn is a sex offender felony. Be advised.

[bella1]

It isn't. This is Anonymous—whoever they are-—going into detail on how the tape was made and obtained. Nothing to fear.

[hanamizu]

If this is actual video of Clinton and a child, it is child porn. Possession or viewing child porn is a sex offender felony. Be advised.

---

I understand your point. As a teacher, if I confiscated a student’s cell phone and his 15 year-old girlfriend had sent him nude pictures of herself, than all of a sudden I am an adult in possession of child porn. So we always had them turn their phones off before handing them over.

But, does video of an adult raping a minor become ‘child porn’? I understand that there is no logic to the law, but it seems far-fetched to say that possession of a video documenting a crime becomes a crime in itself. If a security camera catches a rape in progress, should the owner of video destroy the evidence to avoid prosecution? (And thus be guilty of destroying evidence of a crime—unless he didn’t intend to break the law, of course).

[HiTech RedNeck]

For that reason it might cut out the actual sex scenes (or maybe pixelate them out).

[cynwoody]

If this is actual video of Clinton and a child, it is child porn. Possession or viewing child porn is a sex offender felony. Be advised.

If it is as advertised (I don't think it exists, but I hope I'm wrong), it is evidence in a presidential election, not child porn. It must be proliferated far and wide, damn the consequences!

Post it, repost it, proliferate the link!