It shouldn’t be so public and shouldn’t happen this close to the election but it’s healthy for members of a national party to disagree.
If you want to see totalitarian government - which the media claims Trump will bring - look at the Democratic party (and media). After
* the email issue
* the foundation issues
* the wikileaks
* the total lack of accomplishments that have helped anyone
* Bill, women, her role in sex scandals
* many other things
After all that I haven’t heard a single DC Democrat say she cannot be president. They must know
* she can’t be trusted - by congress, by allies, by enemy, by citizens, by media
* she may go either way with TPP (important to many)
* she may do anything with the environment/energy (important to many)
* foreign leaders cannot trust her (very dangerous for the country)
* she’s likely to be pro-wall-street
* she makes money-in-politics a non-issue when Citizen’s United has been a HUGE issue for them
There have to be democrat politicians who think she’ll be worse than Trump for their state (TPP, terrorism, immigration/jobs, obamacare, etc).
There have to be democrat politicians who don’t want her to be the face of their party for at least 4 years.
But they aren’t allowed to say those things. They must follow the rulers.
>>There have to be democrat politicians who think she’ll be worse than Trump for their state (TPP, terrorism, immigration/jobs, obamacare, etc).
There have to be democrat politicians who don’t want her to be the face of their party for at least 4 years.<<
No doubt there are. There also have to be Democrat voters who feel the same, and while they might not say so, many could vote for Trump. Many more could just stay home.