[MMaschin]

I noticed yesturday that Drudge had the Danney Williams story up, as his main article, WITHOUT any new information. Drudge is onto something, and I think it might be something big!


I'm thinking/hoping that this might tie into what O'keefe has been talking about, as his 'atomic bomb', October surprise. O'keefe has hinted that his surprise is about 'them' (Clinton's? Clinton campaign?), talking about African Americans in the most horrible ways.


If you had something big, where would you release it? Drudge is the only outlet you could go to that 1) you could trust to put it out, and 2) it would be seen.

O'keefe is known for is ability, and tenacity, in undercover investigations.

The problem with what Drudge has been posting, is that without evidence (DNA), it's just a ridiculous story. So - why is Drudge making a big deal out of it?!

What if Danney Williams contacted O'keefe, and asked for his help. What if Danney Williams HAS been able to get a DNA sample, and before going public, he was able to get a meeting with the Clintons, and asked for recognition. And in response to that, the Clinton's went into a racial tirade?

So, what if 1) Danney Williams DOES have DNA proof that Bill Clinton is his biological father, and 2) with O'keefe help, they were able to get undercover video of Danney meeting with the Clinton's, and of them disowning the biological African American son of Bill Clinton, and 3) the whole thing is going to be release on Drudge?


I can hope, and pray! And, based on the known facts, I don't believe that is an unreasonable scenario.

[Yaelle]

Only if they have proof, had it for a while, and Hillary rebuffed Danny, is this even a story.

[silverleaf]

Drudge would not touch the story about Cruz’s bimbos supposedly because he lacked verification

If he is running this story he must have something

But personally- what difference does it make? I care more about Hillary selling our national security to the highest bidder