I get the impression that the foundation is like a candy store, with the door wide open and people coming in constantly for more candy. I think the administrators wanted a smooth operation and these are simply not executive type people like you’d expect with any typical foundation.
I seem to remember something about a watchdog group trying to audit this "foundation", but, they couldn't. The comment from the watchdog was that it was impossible to do an audit because the "foundation" was not set up like a typical charitable organization; but, it was set up more like a "slush fund".
I don't think that info got much traction; but, I remember at the time thinking that it sounded like a Clinton operation.