[Hugin]

I agree with the moderator who said there might be good reasons for announcing attacks – such as giving time for civilians to leave – but it wasn’t quite a counter-argument.

Low point of the debate when the blonde hag moderator flat out argued with Trump for the better part of a minute. No bias there.

[wastoute]

At points it was clear to everyone Trump was debating the Moderators and he called them on it in real time. THAT is how it is done. He prodded them repeatedly. He SHAMED them. And THAT is going to leave a mark.

Actually I am surprised they tried to be as fair as they did but it seemed to me about a third in the mods smelled the blood in the water and turned on Clinton just a bit. At one point she was on her heels, pausing, almost to the point of drawing a blank.

[Former Proud Canadian]

You refer to Martha Radatz as a “blonde hag”. She should be so lucky. She looks like somebody hit her in the face with a shovel. She has a radio face. NPR at best.

[trebb]

I agree with the moderator who said there might be good reasons for announcing attacks – such as giving time for civilians to leave – but it wasn’t quite a counter-argument. Low point of the debate when the blonde hag moderator flat out argued with Trump for the better part of a minute. No bias there.

Yep - how would D-Day have turned out if we hadn't feinted and fooled the enemy? Why did the Brits have a lot of "cardboard airfields"? Telegraphing your actions (vs. coordinating with allies) to the world is a sure way to make the mission a failure.