This may not need stating but, re:
>>”Because this Bush was the interviewer. Recording what was supposed to be an off the record conversation.”
Bush recorded nothing.
“Bush recorded nothing.”
No, his help did. You remind me of a dullard I watched who defended himself pro se. He argued that since the police report specified that the perpetrator was a black man, and also that his complexion was brown, there was no proper identification. He also argued that he could not be guilty of possession when he had already thrown the narcotic down by the time he was apprehended. After a lot of laughs, the pro se defendant was found guilty as charged.
This is a Bush operation at its base. They are scum and quislings.