>>Glad you decided to drop that pretense.
The relationship between man and woman articulated by Jesus is not slavery.
That pretense was yours.
“That pretense was yours.”
No it was not. You never bothered to ask me what I was referring to as “slavery” and instead decided to substitute your own imaginings for what my answer might have been.
In Jesus' time, there was no "Family court" system to strip the husband of his assets (and demand he pay monthly child-support and alimony payments in order to stay out of prison) at whichever point the wife decided that she "was unhaaaaappy".
If a wife decided that she was no longer interested in housework, or no longer interested in sex, the husband could say "Well, in that case, I'm no longer interested in feeding you".