Posted on 10/04/2016 10:36:17 AM PDT by nickcarraway
Dear jj,
If you read my bio, which is here to see in FreeRep, you might think differently.
But, I think it is CUTE, silly, and sloppy, to start throwing labels at someone that you know nothing about. It is demostrative of a more liberal knee-jerk reaction, and not one of someone who just might think a moment, before typing words, which, with your inference to coming from a higher learning background, i had deduced.
I am no member of any ‘conspiracy’ other than being a Nativist, with a Native American heritage, (not the same thing, if you were not knowledgeable) which not all Americans can claim with certainty.
As far as i was taught, and has held true, he was a Jew.
Defining someone as Jewish according to bloodline is exactly what the Nazis did in their notorious Nuremberg Laws. It set the stage for a genocide of millions.
Plus, one's bloodline alone does not necessarily influence one's ideology, especially in the case of Marx, whose writings obviously show contempt for that bloodline.
I am rather emotional about this. I not only disagree with Lerner, but consider her the most wicked of Kapos. In fact, to call her such is a disservice to Jews forced to work with the Nazis, most of whom did what they could to keep as many Jews alive as possible. She is a full Quisling helping to import Muslims and silence Jews.
The Elites of Europe are trying to create Eurabia. It has been an antisemitic project since day one. Bat Ye'or makes this case clear. The people you look to cannot refute this, so they simply ignore it.
PS. You may be interested in the works of the late Lawrence Auster , including his discussion of criticizing Jews without being antisemitic.
Lawrence was an agnostic Reform Jew, who became Catholic.
You might also benefit from reading Frontpage Magazine and the collections of Daniel Greenfield
Dear justiceseeker,
re:
“Defining someone as Jewish according to bloodline is exactly what the Nazis did in their notorious Nuremberg Laws” (I still say he was a Jew.)
What about all this ‘ancestry dot com’ nonsense?
In this time and date, would that not describe how ‘the family name’ has always been defended, until the last few decades? Family inheritances by bloodline? Family succession by bloodline ... wasn’t that one of the stipulations in the feudal codes?
Bi-racial kids ending up with sickle cell anemia, Barr-Epstein, and other peculiar anomalies previously identified as residing within certain racial groups, alone?
And for the record, there are only 3 (three) races, Caucasian, Negroid, and Mongoloid. (For example, mexican is not a race. it is a nation.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.