To: Strategy
Given that the State Dept. spokesman threatened terrorist attacks against Russia just a couple of days ago, only a complete fool would imagine this was anything other than an official U.S. government action.
9 posted on
10/04/2016 7:50:12 AM PDT by
thoughtomator
(This message has been encrypted in ROT13 twice for maximum security)
To: thoughtomator
Given that the State Dept. spokesman threatened terrorist attacks against Russia just a couple of days ago, only a complete fool would imagine this was anything other than an official U.S. government action.
Given that Russia has threatened nuclear war in the past, only a fool would think this is anything more than Putinist saber rattling. No need to get your panties in a twist.
29 posted on
10/04/2016 8:07:07 AM PDT by
lodi90
(Clear choice for Conservatives now: TRUMP or lose)
To: thoughtomator
Given that the State Dept. spokesman threatened terrorist attacks against Russia just a couple of days ago, I wonder if Admiral Kirby is counting how many Russians get sent home in body bags from this little debacle.
30 posted on
10/04/2016 8:13:08 AM PDT by
pgkdan
(The Silent MajorityStands With TRUMP!)
To: thoughtomator
“Given that the State Dept. spokesman threatened terrorist attacks against Russia”
I’m sorry I missed this! May I ask for a link to the story you’re referencing?
Thank you kindly!
57 posted on
10/04/2016 4:11:03 PM PDT by
MeganC
(JE SUIS CHARLES MARTEL!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson