And when the case comes to trial I’ll side with the property owner and nullify the other jurors.
OK, well you asked what I thought to be good-faith questions and I’ve given you good-faith answers from my understanding of common law.
Given those answers, I’m not sure what you dislike unless you think the electrified sign is not dangerous or deadly. That might be possible, but as I said, the law generally frowns on devices rigged to harm. It’s an issue of unlimited justification of bodily harm to protect property which, as I said, has been hammered out in common law over the centuries and I think is generally reasonable and good.